Permalink
- Comments (View)That's right. Impeachment, plain and simple.
The future of the country is much more dependent on the impeachment of Bush and Cheney than it is on whoever Edwards endorses as Democratic nominee. Change is needed, but given the current choices, we all known the election will only bring about cosmetic change. That is, unless impeachment happens first.
Today, John Conyers, House Judicial Committee chair, says he is finally willing to consider launching impeachment hearings against Cheney. Being a party Democrat, he wants to hear the political arguments first: he knows the legal grounds very well. Let's not pass up this opportunity!! Millions of people around the world are counting on us.
Permalink
- Comments (View)That's right. Impeachment, plain and simple.
The future of the country is much more dependent on the impeachment of Bush and Cheney than it is on whoever Edwards endorses as Democratic nominee. Change is needed, but given the current choices, we all known the election will only bring about cosmetic change. That is, unless impeachment happens first.
Today, John Conyers, House Judicial Committee chair, says he is finally willing to consider launching impeachment hearings against Cheney. Being a party Democrat, he wants to hear the political arguments first: he knows the legal grounds very well. Let's not pass up this opportunity!! Millions of people around the world are counting on us.
Permalink
- Comments (View)don't endorse either - it will not be easy for either of them to win.
John is the only one that could win. And would have but we had to fight the national media!
Permalink
- Comments (View)don't endorse either - it will not be easy for either of them to win.
John is the only one that could win. And would have but we had to fight the national media!
Permalink
- Comments (View)I fervently hope that Edwards does not make an endorsement in the remaining primaries. He should say that both Clinton and Obama would be a great president and he should concentrate on advancing his (our) agenda. Neither Obama nor Clinton shares that sensibility enough although she comes closer. Somehow Obama is seen as the more liberal of the two and he simply is not. We have to work to move them toward the economic and social justice articulated by Edwards.
Permalink
- Comments (View)I fervently hope that Edwards does not make an endorsement in the remaining primaries. He should say that both Clinton and Obama would be a great president and he should concentrate on advancing his (our) agenda. Neither Obama nor Clinton shares that sensibility enough although she comes closer. Somehow Obama is seen as the more liberal of the two and he simply is not. We have to work to move them toward the economic and social justice articulated by Edwards.
Permalink
- Comments (View)I fervently hope that Edwards does not make an endorsement in the remaining primaries. He should say that both Clinton and Obama would be a great president and he should concentrate on advancing his (our) agenda. Neither Obama nor Clinton shares that sensibility enough although she comes closer. Somehow Obama is seen as the more liberal of the two and he simply is not. We have to work to move them toward the economic and social justice articulated by Edwards.
Permalink
- Comments (View)*We need to make it safe to vote for an Independent party candidate--that's basically the platform John Edwards promotes.
*Imagine if all those Nader votes hadn't had to have been thrown away--the registration list purge by the Repugs would not have worked, would it?
Instead of going to Gore or Shrub or into the waste basket, the Nader votes would have gone to something more in keeping with the voter's intent.
And it would have happened relatively 'instantly' without all the legal fees, etc., frat boy stormtroopers invading W Palm Beach offices, etc..
*This would widen the parameters of allowable debate embolden true Democrats, restrain Repug nutjobs,

























